下列关于风险资本的说法中，不正确的是( )。(第六章 风险与风险管理) A.应急资本是风险资本的表现形式之一 B. 应急资本是企业风险转移策略的一种方式 C. 应急资本是一个在一定条件下的融资选择权，公司可以不使用这个权利 D.应急资本可以提供经营持续性的保证

下列关于确定风险偏好和风险承受度，说法正确的是( )。(第六章 风险与风险管理)

A. 应该从整体上确定风险偏好和风险承受度，而不是对每一个风险都可以确定风险 偏好和风险承受度

B. 既要考虑同一个风险在各个业务单位或子公司之间的分配，又要考虑不同风险之 间的关系

C. 一般同一风险在不同行业的风险偏好是相同的

D.重大风险的风险偏好应该由高级管理层确定

预期损失融资一般作为运营资本的一部分，而非预期损失融资则是属于( )的范畴。(第六章 风险与风险管理)

A. 融资资本

B.风险资本

C.投资资本

D.运营资本

下列关于增值税一般纳税人和小规模纳税人年应税销售额的说法，正确的有(　)。

A.年应税销售额是指在一个日历年度的经营期内累计应征增值税销售额

B.年应税销售额包括预售销售额、稽查查补销售额

C.稽查查补销售额和纳税评估调整销售额计入应税行为发生当月的销售额

D.纳税人偶然发生的转让不动产的销售额，不计入应税行为年应税销售额

E.纳税人偶然发生的销售无形资产的销售额，不计入应税行为年应税销售额

截止到2019年3月1日，( )小规模纳税人发生经营行为，需要开具专票的，可以通过增值税发票管理新系统自行开具。

A.住宿业

B.房地产业

C.鉴证咨询业

D.建筑业

E.商务服务业

增值税一般纳税人取得走逃(失联)企业开具的异常增值税扣税凭证，下列处理符合规定的有(　)。

A.增值税一般纳税人取得异常凭证，尚未申报抵扣或申报出口退税的，暂不允许抵扣或办理退税

B.已经申报抵扣的，一律先作进项税额转出

C.一律不允许抵扣进项税额

D.已经办理出口退税的，税务机关可按照异常增值税扣税凭证所涉及的退税额对该企业其他已经审核通过的退税款暂缓办理退税，否则由出口企业提供相应担保

E.经核实，符合现行增值税进项税额抵扣或出口退税相关规定的，企业可继续申报抵扣进项税额，或解除担保并继续办理出口退税

根据票据法律制度的规定，被追索人在向持票人支付有关金额及费用后，可以向其他汇票债务人行使再追索权。下列属于再追索权追索金额的有( )。

A.被追索人已经清偿的全部金额及其利息

B.持票人取得有关拒绝证明的费用

C.被追索人发出追索通知书的费用

D.持票人因票据金额被拒绝支付而导致的间接损失

甲伪造乙的签章签发一张支票给丙，出票日期为2018年2月1日，丙又背书转让给丁支付货款。2018年2月20日，丁提示付款被拒绝。当丁行使票据追索权时，下列说法符合票据法律制度规定的有( )。

A.丙有权以丁逾期提示付款为由拒绝承担票据责任

B.丙有权以出票人的签章被伪造致使票据无效为由拒绝承担票据责任

C.乙有权以自己的签章被伪造为由拒绝承担票据责任

D.甲有权以票据上并无自己的签章为由拒绝承担票据责任

Buyer and Seller entered into a sales contract to buy 10,000 kg chemical products at a price of RMB 200 yuan/kg, totalling RMB 2 million yuan. Among other things, the sales contract stipulated the following terms and conditions: within 10 days after the conclusion of the contract Buyer would make the advance payment of RMB 500,000 yuan and Seller was to deliver all the goods to the place of Buyer; the remaining price of RMB 1·5 million yuan should be paid within five days upon the delivery of goods; any breach of contract should be subject to the liquidated damages equivalent to 20% of the total price.

Buyer made the advance payment, but Seller did not deliver any goods. Buyer urged Seller to deliver the goods immediately, as its production would be seriously affected by the short supply of the goods. However, Seller declared force majeure as the reason for non-delivery. Seller insisted that it was only a trading company, not a producer of the chemical products. Seller alleged that upon the conclusion of the contract, it entered into a purchase agreement with a producer to buy the goods from the latter. Due to a fire accident, the producer could not supply the goods under the purchase agreement; Seller therefore could not deliver the goods to Buyer. Non-delivery of goods was due to force majeure that caused the failure to supply the goods by the producer to Seller.

Buyer refused to accept Seller’s argument and bought 10,000 kg of the same products for replacement at a price of RMB 220 yuan/kg, resulting in a total extra cost of RMB 200,000 yuan. Meanwhile it filed a lawsuit against Seller in the court, requesting liquidated damages of RMB 400,000 yuan (20% of the total price) and the damages of RMB 200,000 yuan for extra price caused for the urgent purchase.

Required:

Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answer:

(a) state whether Seller’s argument of force majeure can be established;

(b) state whether Buyer’s claims for liquidated damages and damages should be supported by the court.

In January 2011 Mr Fang, the owner of a private enterprise, entered into a loan agreement and a mortgage agreement with a local credit association (Credit Association) to borrow RMB 2 million yuan for one year to meet the needs of his business operation, and provided his own house as the subject matter under the mortgage agreement. After the conclusion of the mortgage agreement, Mr Fang and Credit Association went to register the mortgage agreement with the local real estate registration centre.

In June 2011 Mr Fang leased the same house to Ms Lee for a period of two years.

Due to the sudden change of the market and poor operation of his enterprise, Mr Fang was unable to repay the principal and interest as agreed when the loan matured at the end of January 2012. Credit Association filed a lawsuit in the people’s court and obtained a judgement in favour of its claim for the principal RMB 2 million yuan plus interest.

Credit Association then advised Ms Lee to leave the house, as it has been authorised by the people’s court to organise a public auction to sell the house for the enforcement of the judgement. Ms Lee refused to leave the house on the grounds that the lease agreement was an effective one between Mr Fang and herself and would last until the end of June 2013. In addition, Credit Association’s right of mortgagee should not affect her right under the lease agreement.

Required:

Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Property Law, and give your reasons for your answer:

(a) state whether Ms Lee’s grounds for refusal to leave the house can be established.

(b) state how Ms Lee should deal with the current situation.

长期借款筹资与长期债券筹资相比，其特点是( )。（第十章 长期筹资)

A.利息能节税

B.筹资弹性大

C.筹资费用大

D.债务利息高